Cullan and Cullan LLC v. M-Qube et al

Filing 179

ORDER - The parties shall have until June 1, 2016, to indicate whether the parties consent to disposition of the case by a magistrate judge. The parties may indicate their consent by filing a completed Consent to Exercise Jurisdiction form, which is posted on the court's website, www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If no such form is timely filed, the case will be reassigned to a district judge, and the magistrate judge will handle all nondispositive pretrial matters. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (KLF)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA CULLAN AND CULLAN LLC, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, vs. 8:13CV172 ORDER M-QUBE, INC., a Delaware corporation, and MOBILE MESSENGER AMERICAS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs, vs. CF ENTERPRISES PTY., LTD., Australin company, an Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff, vs. JOHN DOES 1-200, Defendants, and RICHARD GEIER, Intervenor. This matter is before the court sua sponte. On December 29, 2014, the plaintiff and two defendants filed a Joint Rule 26(f) Report and Discovery Plan (Filing No. 135). In the Report, the filing parties noted their consent to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). See Filing No. 135 p. 14. Based on the Report, the Clerk of Court reassigned the case to the undersigned magistrate judge for full disposition. See Filing No. 136. However, prior to entry of the Report, on January 1, 2014, District Judge Joseph F. Bataillon entered an order granting Richard Geier leave to intervene. See Filing No. 74. Since consent to disposition of this case by a magistrate judge must be unanimous, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(2), each party is required to notify the court whether he consents to such assignment or opt to have the case reassigned to a district judge of the court. If all parties consent, the case will remain with the undersigned magistrate judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). If all parties do not consent, the case will be reassigned to a district judge, and a magistrate judge will handle all nondispositive pretrial matters. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: The parties shall have until June 1, 2016, to indicate whether the parties consent to disposition of the case by a magistrate judge. The parties may indicate their consent by filing a completed Consent to Exercise Jurisdiction form, which is posted on the court's website, www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If no such form is timely filed, the case will be reassigned to a district judge, and the magistrate judge will handle all nondispositive pretrial matters. Dated this 5th day of May, 2016. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?