Cullan and Cullan LLC v. M-Qube et al

Filing 93

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that defendants' motions to dismiss and/or to compel arbitration (Filing Nos. 17 and 20 ) are hereby denied without prejudice to reassertion. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA CULLAN AND CULLAN LLC, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; 8:13CV172 Plaintiff, v. M-QUBE, INC., a Delaware corporation; MOBILE MESSENGER AMERICAS, INC., a Delaware Corporation; CF ENTERPRISES PTY., LTD., an Australian Company; and JOHN DOES 1-200, ORDER Defendants, RICHARD GEIER, Intervenor. This matter is before the court on its own motion. There is presently pending a motion for preliminary approval of a purported class-action settlement (Filing No. 83). Consideration of the defendants’ motions to dismiss and/or to compel arbitration have been held in abeyance pending resolution of the class-action settlement issue. See Filing No. 79. For docket control purposes, the motions to dismiss and/or compel arbitration, Filing Nos. 17 and 20, will be dismissed without prejudice to reassertion after resolution of the motion to approve the amended settlement agreement (Filing No. 83).1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that defendants’ motions to dismiss and/or to compel arbitration (Filing Nos. 17 and 20) are hereby denied without prejudice to reassertion. DATED this 28th day of March, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon United States District Judge 1 Should the parties seek to reassert the motions at a later date, they need not refile any supporting materials on which they intend to rely, but may incorporate them by reference to the documents’ filing numbers.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?