Robinson v. Sabatka-Rine
ORDER - THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Counsel's motion to withdraw, Filing No. 58 , is granted. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, Filing No. 60 , is denied. The defendant may not proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Edward Robinson, Jr.,
This matter is before the court on the motion to withdraw, Filing No. 58; motion for
reconsideration, Filing No. 60; and a copy of an IFP memo, Filing No. 61, relating to plaintiff’s notice
of appeal, Filing No. 59.
Marnie A. Jensen, Kamron T.M. Hasan, and the law firm of Husch Blackwell LLP hereby
seek leave from this court to withdraw as counsel of record. Filing No. 58. They indicate their
representation is over, and defendant has now filed his own appeal.
The court agrees that
representation of the plaintiff has ended and counsel are entitled to withdraw.
With regard to the motion for reconsideration, Filing No. 60, of this court’s denial of a
certificate of appealability, Filing No. 56, the court finds there is no basis for this motion and it is
frivolous and without merit. For the same reasons set forth in Filing No. 56, at 33, a certificate of
appealability will not issue.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. Counsel’s motion to withdraw, Filing No. 58, is granted.
2. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, Filing No. 60, is denied.
3. The defendant may not proceed in forma pauperis.
Dated this 23rd day of January, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?