Sand Creek Post & Beam, Inc.

Filing 37

ORDER OF DISMISSAL that Plaintiff Sand Creek Post & Beam, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice as to Defendant Mitel NetSolutions 35 is granted. Plaintiff Sand Creek Post & Beam, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice as to Defendant Fulton Communications, Inc. 36 is granted. This matter is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Mitel NetSolutions and Fulton Communications, Inc. This case is terminated for statistical purposes. The Court will not assess costs or attorney's fees. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JSF)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA SAND CREEK POST & BEAM, INC., a Nebraska Corporation; 8:13CV220 Plaintiff, vs. ORDER OF DISMISSAL MITEL NETSOLUTIONS, INC., a Texas Corporation; and FULTON COMMUNICATIONS, Inc., a Georgia Corporation; Defendants. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Sand Creek Post & Beam, Inc.’s (“Sand Creek”) Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice as to Defendant Mitel NetSolutions (Filing No. 35), and Sand Creek’s Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice as to Defendant Fulton Communications, Inc. (Filing No. 36). Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A), the Court finds that the Motions should be granted and that the abovecaptioned matter should be dismissed with prejudice as to the remaining defendants in this case, Defendants Mitel NetSolutions and Fulton Communications, Inc. Because all defendants have been dismissed, this case will be terminated. The Court will not assess costs or attorney’s fees. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff Sand Creek Post & Beam, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice as to Defendant Mitel NetSolutions (Filing No. 35) is granted; 2. Plaintiff Sand Creek Post & Beam, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice as to Defendant Fulton Communications, Inc. (Filing No. 36) is granted; 3. The above-captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Mitel NetSolutions and Fulton Communications, Inc.; 4. This case is terminated for statistical purposes; and 5. The Court will not assess costs or attorney’s fees. Dated this 14th day of July, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/Laurie Smith Camp Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?