Joao Bock Transaction Systems, LLC v. Online Resources Corp.
Filing
198
ORDER - The plaintiff's unopposed request for redaction 197 is granted. The Court Reporter is directed to redact the transcript of the June 5, 2015, Markman Hearing to redact portions of lines 5,7, and 11 of page 76, as requested. The Court Report may deliver the redacted transcript to any requesting third-party in the normal course of business.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JOAO BOCK TRANSACTION
SYSTEMS, LLC,
Plaintiff,
8:13CV245
vs.
ONLINE RESOURCES CORP.,
ORDER
Defendant.
This matter is before the court on Joao Bock Transaction Systems, LLC’s request
for redaction (Filing No. 197). On July 16, 2015, the court allowed the transcript of the
June 5, 2015, Markman Hearing (Filing No. 196) to be sealed pending resolution of the
parties’ request for redaction. See Filing No. 194. The request was prompted by nonparty Richard V. Wells’ request for the transcript, which the court delayed pending
resolution of the redaction request. See Filing No. 192 - Order. The plaintiff proposes
limited redactions to protect confidential information contained on page 76 of the
transcript.
See Filing No. 197.
The court finds good cause exists to allow the
redactions prior to the transcript’s public disclosure. Upon consideration,
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
The plaintiff’s unopposed request for redaction (Filing No. 197) is granted.
2.
The Court Reporter is directed to redact the transcript of the June 5, 2015,
Markman Hearing to redact portions of lines 5, 7, and 11 of page 76, as requested.
3.
The Court Reporter may deliver the redacted transcript to any requesting
third-party in the normal course of business.
Dated this 31st day of August, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?