Joao Bock Transaction Systems, LLC v. Online Resources Corp.

Filing 198

ORDER - The plaintiff's unopposed request for redaction 197 is granted. The Court Reporter is directed to redact the transcript of the June 5, 2015, Markman Hearing to redact portions of lines 5,7, and 11 of page 76, as requested. The Court Report may deliver the redacted transcript to any requesting third-party in the normal course of business.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JOAO BOCK TRANSACTION SYSTEMS, LLC, Plaintiff, 8:13CV245 vs. ONLINE RESOURCES CORP., ORDER Defendant. This matter is before the court on Joao Bock Transaction Systems, LLC’s request for redaction (Filing No. 197). On July 16, 2015, the court allowed the transcript of the June 5, 2015, Markman Hearing (Filing No. 196) to be sealed pending resolution of the parties’ request for redaction. See Filing No. 194. The request was prompted by nonparty Richard V. Wells’ request for the transcript, which the court delayed pending resolution of the redaction request. See Filing No. 192 - Order. The plaintiff proposes limited redactions to protect confidential information contained on page 76 of the transcript. See Filing No. 197. The court finds good cause exists to allow the redactions prior to the transcript’s public disclosure. Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The plaintiff’s unopposed request for redaction (Filing No. 197) is granted. 2. The Court Reporter is directed to redact the transcript of the June 5, 2015, Markman Hearing to redact portions of lines 5, 7, and 11 of page 76, as requested. 3. The Court Reporter may deliver the redacted transcript to any requesting third-party in the normal course of business. Dated this 31st day of August, 2015. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?