Braddock et al v. Primus Group, Inc.
Filing
31
ORDER - Timothy Hooks motion to withdraw (Case No. 7:13CV5006, filing 125; Case No. 8:11CV402, filing 162) is granted. The Clerk of Court shall terminate Mr. Hooks appearance as counsel for Frontera Produce, Ltd. and shall cease further notices to Mr. Hook in this litigation. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (Copy mailed )(MKR)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
RONALD D. BRADDOCK AND
CHARLES W. PETERSON, Co-Personal
Representatives of the Estate of Dale
Braddock,
Plaintiffs,
V.
FRONTERA PRODUCE, LTD., PRIMUS
GROUP, INC., and DILLON
COMPANIES, INC.,
Defendants.
RONALD D. BRADDOCK and CHARLES
W. PETERSON, Co-Personal
Representatives of the Estate of Dale
Braddock,
Plaintiffs,
V.
PRIMUS GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.
ISLA DRINKWALTER, individually and
as Personal Representative for the Estate
of George Drinkwalter,
Plaintiff,
V.
FRONTERA PRODUCE LTD, a foreign
corporation, PRIMUS GROUP, INC., a
foreign corporation, WALMART
STORES, INC., a foreign corporation, and
JOHN DOES 1-10,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
8:11CV402
ORDER
8:13CV258
7:13CV5006
Timothy Hook has moved to withdraw as counsel for Frontera Produce, Ltd. in the
above-captioned litigation. (Case No. 7:13CV5006, filing 125; Case No. 8:11CV402, filing
162.) Upon the representation that Frontera will remain represented in these actions, the
motion to withdraw will be granted.
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
Timothy Hook’s motion to withdraw (Case No. 7:13CV5006, filing 125; Case
No. 8:11CV402, filing 162) is granted.
2.
The Clerk of Court shall terminate Mr. Hook’s appearance as counsel for
Frontera Produce, Ltd. and shall cease further notices to Mr. Hook in this
litigation.
DATED August 20, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
S/ F.A. Gossett
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?