Anderson v. Creditors Collection Services

Filing 3

ORDER - The plaintiff has until the close of business on January 30, 2014, to file with the Clerk of Court evidence of service or show cause why this case should not be dismissed as against the defendant for failure to prosecute. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA TOM ANDERSON, Plaintiff, 8:13CV283 vs. ORDER CREDITORS COLLECTION SERVICES, a/k/a CCS, Defendant. This matter is before the court after a review of the court file and pursuant to NECivR 41.2, which states in pertinent part: “At any time, a case not being prosecuted with reasonable diligence may be dismissed for lack of prosecution.” Further, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) establishes a 120-day time limit for service of process on any defendant in a civil case, absent a showing of good cause. In this case the complaint was filed on September 11, 2013. See Filing No. 1. The plaintiff has initiated no other action in this matter. There is no evidence in the record the plaintiff sought summons or served process on the defendant. The deadline for service of process expired on or about January 9, 2014. The defendant has not made an appearance. It remains the plaintiff’s duty to go forward in prosecuting the case. Under the circumstances, the plaintiff must make a showing of good cause for the failure of timely service or the action must be dismissed against the defendant. Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED: The plaintiff has until the close of business on January 30, 2014, to file with the Clerk of Court evidence of service or show cause why this case should not be dismissed as against the defendant for failure to prosecute. Dated this 15th day of January, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?