Mumm v. Bonam
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that this matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
DUSTIN A. MUMM,
DARRELL F. BONAM,
This matter is before the court on its own motion. On December 2, 2013, the
court conducted an initial review of Plaintiff’s Complaint and found that it failed to
state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Filing No. 7.) The court gave
Plaintiff an opportunity to amend his Complaint, but warned Plaintiff that if he failed
to amend by January 3, 2014, his claims would dismissed “without prejudice and
without further notice.” (Id. at CM/ECF p. 5.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended
complaint by the court’s deadline. (See Docket Sheet.) Accordingly,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to
prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with this court’s orders.
A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this
Memorandum and Order.
DATED this 27th day of January, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend,
approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on
their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties
or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or
functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or
directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?