Larsen v. Colvin

Filing 11

ORDER - IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that: 1. the plaintiff's Motion to Extend Brief Deadline, ECF No. 10 , is granted; 2. the plaintiff shall have on or before May 7, 2014, in which to file and serve her brief in support of plaintiff's posit ion; 3. the defendant shall have 35 days from the date on which the plaintiff's brief is filed in which to file an answer brief; 4. within one week after the defendant's answer brief is filed, the plaintiff may file and serve a reply brief; and 5. the case shall be deemed to be submitted at the expiration of the time period specified in paragraph 4 hereof. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA LORIE LARSEN, Plaintiff, 8:13CV313 vs. ORDER ON MOTION TO EXTEND BRIEF DEADLINE CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration; Defendant. The plaintiff, by an through her counsel, has filed a Motion to Extend Brief Deadline, ECF No. 10. The plaintiff requests an extension of 30 days in which to submit a brief in support of her position. The plaintiff’s counsel has contacted defendant’s counsel and defendant’s counsel has expressed no objection to the extension. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that: 1. the plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Brief Deadline, ECF No. 10, is granted; 2. the plaintiff shall have on or before May 7, 2014, in which to file and serve her brief in support of plaintiff's position; 3. the defendant shall have 35 days from the date on which the plaintiff’s brief is filed in which to file an answer brief; 4. within one week after the defendant's answer brief is filed, the plaintiff may file and serve a reply brief ; and 5. the case shall be deemed to be submitted at the expiration of the time period specified in paragraph 4 hereof. Dated April 7, 2014. BY THE COURT ___________________________________________ Warren K. Urbom United States Senior District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?