Heim v. BNSF Railway Company
ORDER - After conferring with counsel, The defendant's anticipated motion for protective order regarding plaintiff's 30(b)(6) deposition notice shall be filed on or before January 9, 2015. The plaintiff's response to that motion shall be filed on or before January 16, 2015, with any reply due on or before January 23, 2015... Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY,
After conferring with counsel,
IT IS ORDERED:
The defendant’s anticipated motion for protective order regarding
plaintiff’s 30(b)(6) deposition notice shall be filed on or before January 9, 2015. The
plaintiff’s response to that motion shall be filed on or before January 16, 2015, with any
reply due on or before January 23, 2015.
As to the two fact railroad fact witnesses the plaintiff wishes to depose, and
the 30(b)(6) deposition discussed in paragraph 1 (if the motion for protective order is
denied), the deposition deadline is continued, and the parties shall cooperate in
scheduling those depositions. In all other respects, the deposition deadline within the
court’s prior scheduling order remains in effect.
The parties shall promptly consider whether settlement negotiations are
warranted and, if so, implement those efforts in good faith—starting with the plaintiff’s
The parties are advised that any dispositive motions must be promptly filed.
Any delay will likely result in moving the pretrial conference and trial date on the court’s
January 6, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?