Infogroup, Inc. et al v. DatabaseLLC et al
ORDER on 125 Motion to Compel. A telephonic status conference to discuss the parties' ongoing discovery efforts will be held at 1:00 p.m. on October 2, 2015, before the undersigned magistrate judge. Counsel shall use the call-in information assigned to this case (see Filing No. 137 ) to participate in the conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
INFOGROUP, INC., Delaware corporation;
DATABASE LLC, a Nevada limitedliability company; et.al;
The court held a conference call on September 1, 2015 to discuss Defendants’
motion to compel, (Filing No. 125). As stated on the record, and with the agreement of
On or before September 4, 2015, the parties were required to meet and confer
regarding search terms and the scope of defendants’ requested email production,
and to complete that meet and confer process;
On or before September 18, 2015, the defendants will produce (subject any
specific objections stated per document request) all documents in their possession
or control that are responsive to Defendants’ Requests for Production;
As to each document production request, if the plaintiffs are withholding any
documents pursuant to an objection, the response shall not only raise the objection
but shall also identify or describe the category of responsive documents that have
not been produced; and
If references to documents are or must be used by Plaintiffs to fully and
completely respond to Defendants’ interrogatories, on or before September 18,
2015, Plaintiffs shall serve interrogatory responses or supplemental responses
which identify, by Bates number, and as to each interrogatory, the documents
responsive to the interrogatory.
The court is concerned that absent periodic court supervision, the parties’
discovery will not be completed by the deadlines set in the court’s progression order,
either due to delayed production or due to extensive motion practice.
IT IS ORDERED:
Defendants’ motion to compel, (Filing No. 125), is resolved in accordance
with the contents of this order and the representations of counsel during the
conference held on September 1, 2015.
A telephonic status conference to discuss the parties’ ongoing discovery
efforts will be held at 1:00 p.m. on October 2, 2015, before the undersigned
magistrate judge. Counsel shall use the call-in information assigned to this
case (see Filing No. 137) to participate in the conference.
If any discovery disputes exist as of September 29, 2015, on or before
October 1, 2015, the parties shall file a joint summary, not to exceed ten
double-spaced pages in length, which outlines the discovery requests at
issue, the objections that are being asserted, and the parties’ respective
positions on the disputed discovery.
If discovery disputes exist as of the date and time of the scheduled hearing
on October 2, 2015, the hearing will be held on the record and the parties
shall be prepared to discuss the merits of those discovery issues.
September 13, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?