Infogroup, Inc. et al v. DatabaseLLC et al

Filing 279

ORDER granting 278 Motion to Withdraw Document. 241 Motion for Protective Order and 256 Motion for Sanctions are withdrawn; 257 Motion to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act is granted; and 262 Motion for Protective Order is denied as moot. A telephonic conference with the undersigned magistrate judge will be held on October 25, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. to discuss further case progression. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA INFOGROUP, INC., Delaware corporation; et. al; 8:14CV49 Plaintiffs, ORDER vs. DATABASELLC, a Nevada limitedliability company; et. al; Defendants. IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendants’ motion to withdraw, (Filing No. 278), is granted, and their motions, (Filing Nos. 241 and 256), are withdrawn without prejudice to refiling, if required, after the parties have further attempted to resolve their discovery and protective order disputes without court intervention. 2) Defendants’ motion to restrict, (Filing No. 257), is granted. 3) Defendants’ motion for protective order, (Filing No. 262), was addressed in the court’s prior order, (Filing No. 272, ¶ 1), and it is likely fully resolved. Filing No. 262 is therefore denied, but without prejudice to re-filing if some of the issues raised are not moot and, after counsel’s further attempts to resolve those ongoing issues, they cannot be resolved without court intervention. 4) A telephonic conference with the undersigned magistrate judge will be held on October 25, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. to discuss further case progression. Counsel shall use the conferencing instructions assigned to this case, (see Filing No. 137), to participate in the call. October 24, 2017. BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?