Myers v. Blumenthal et al
Filing
45
ORDER that the parties' Stipulation for Settlement (hereinafter "the Settlement Agreement") (Filing No. 44) is hereby approved and incorporated herein. The court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms and conditions of the Settle ment Agreement. This matter is stayed pending compliance with the Settlement Agreement. In accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the plaintiff shall advise the court on or before May 15, 2016, of the defendant's compliance with, or default of, the Settlement Agreement and the court will enter either a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, or an order of dismissal with prejudice, as applicable. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
RICHARD D. MYERS, Bankruptcy Trustee
of M&M Marketing, L.L.C. and Premier
Fighter, L.L.C.;
8:14CV57
Plaintiff,
ORDER
vs.
MICHAEL L. BLUMENTHAL, AND FRANK
VICARI, an Individual;
Defendants.
This matter is before the court on the parties Stipulation for settlement. The court
finds that the stipulation for settlement should be approved. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1.
The parties' Stipulation for Settlement (hereinafter "the Settlement
Agreement") (Filing No. 44) is hereby approved and incorporated herein.
2.
The court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms and conditions of the
Settlement Agreement.
3.
This matter is stayed pending compliance with the Settlement Agreement.
4.
In accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the plaintiff
shall advise the court on or before May 15, 2016, of the defendant's compliance with, or
default of, the Settlement Agreement and the court will enter either a judgment in favor
of the plaintiff and against the defendant, or an order of dismissal with prejudice, as
applicable.
Dated this 19th day of November, 2015
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?