Myers v. Blumenthal et al

Filing 45

ORDER that the parties' Stipulation for Settlement (hereinafter "the Settlement Agreement") (Filing No. 44) is hereby approved and incorporated herein. The court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms and conditions of the Settle ment Agreement. This matter is stayed pending compliance with the Settlement Agreement. In accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the plaintiff shall advise the court on or before May 15, 2016, of the defendant's compliance with, or default of, the Settlement Agreement and the court will enter either a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, or an order of dismissal with prejudice, as applicable. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA RICHARD D. MYERS, Bankruptcy Trustee of M&M Marketing, L.L.C. and Premier Fighter, L.L.C.; 8:14CV57 Plaintiff, ORDER vs. MICHAEL L. BLUMENTHAL, AND FRANK VICARI, an Individual; Defendants. This matter is before the court on the parties Stipulation for settlement. The court finds that the stipulation for settlement should be approved. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The parties' Stipulation for Settlement (hereinafter "the Settlement Agreement") (Filing No. 44) is hereby approved and incorporated herein. 2. The court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement. 3. This matter is stayed pending compliance with the Settlement Agreement. 4. In accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the plaintiff shall advise the court on or before May 15, 2016, of the defendant's compliance with, or default of, the Settlement Agreement and the court will enter either a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, or an order of dismissal with prejudice, as applicable. Dated this 19th day of November, 2015 BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?