Schrunk v. Colvin

Filing 5

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If requested to do so, the U.S. Marshall will serve process in this case without prepayment of fees. In making such a request, Plaintiff's counsel must complete the Marshal's Form 285, to be submitted to the Clerk of the Court with the completed summons forms and copies of the Complaint. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (ADB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA KERRY E. SCHRUNK, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 8:14CV64 vs. CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Defendant. This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s affidavit and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Filing No. 3) filed through counsel. Based on a review of the application and affidavit, the Court finds that payment of any fees and the posting of any bond should be waived, and the Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Filing No. 3) is granted, and payment of costs and fees is not required for the filing of the appeal; 2. If requested to do so, the U.S. Marshall will serve process in this case without prepayment of fees. In making such a request, Plaintiff’s counsel must complete the Marshal’s Form 285, to be submitted to the Clerk of the Court with the completed summons forms and copies of the Complaint; and 3. This order is entered without prejudice to the Court later entering an order taxing costs in this case. No one, including the Plaintiff, is relieved by this order from the obligation to pay or to reimburse taxable costs after the completion of this action. Dated this 13th day of March, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/Laurie Smith Camp Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?