Shanghai Foretex Fashion Co., Ltd. v. Wes and Willy, LLC
Filing
65
ORDER - The case progression schedule is stayed pending further order of the court. A telephonic conference with the undersigned magistrate judge will be held on February 25, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. to discuss the current status of the parties settle ment efforts or to set a new progression schedule for trial. Counsel for plaintiff shall place the call. This call will be cancelled and a deadline will be set for filing dismissal documents if, prior to the call, the parties advise my chambers b y telephone ((402) 437-1670) or by email (zwart@ned.uscourts.gov) that the parties' have fully settled the case.( Telephone Conference set for 2/25/2015 at 09:00 AM by Telephone before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart) Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (MKR)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
SHANGHAI FORETEX FASHION CO.,
LTD.,
8:14CV106
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER
WES AND WILLY, LLC, RYCAM, INC.,
WILLIAM J. MULLEN,
Defendants.
During the conference call held today, the parties’ counsel explained that the
parties are attempting to settle this case and they need additional time to determine their
options for doing so. To further those efforts, and to limit expenditures on potentially
unnecessary discovery,
IT IS ORDERED:
1)
The case progression schedule is stayed pending further order of the court.
2)
A telephonic conference with the undersigned magistrate judge will be held
on February 25, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. to discuss the current status of the
parties settlement efforts or to set a new progression schedule for trial.
Counsel for plaintiff shall place the call.
3)
This call will be cancelled and a deadline will be set for filing dismissal
documents if, prior to the call, the parties advise my chambers by telephone
((402) 437-1670) or by email (zwart@ned.uscourts.gov) that the parties’
have fully settled the case.
December 23, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?