Frazier et al v. Andrews et al
Filing
13
ORDER OF DISMISSAL - Relator Melanie Frazier's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Filing No. 11 ) and the United States Notice of Consent to Voluntary Dismissal (Filing No. 12 ) are approved. The Complaint in the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice as to Relator and without prejudice as to the United States. The Court will not assess costs and attorney's fees. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Ex Rel.
Melanie Frazier,
8:14CV113
Plaintiffs,
vs.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
RICHARD V. ANDREWS, M.D.; RA
NEUROLOGICAL, P.C.; ALEGENT
CREIGHTON HEALTH, ALEGENT
CREIGHTON HEALTH IMMANUEL
MEDICAL CENTER f/k/a and d/b/a
ALEGENT HEALTH-IMMANUEL
MEDICAL CENTER d/b/a THE EPILEPSY
CENTER,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on Relator Melanie Frazier’s Notice of Voluntary
Dismissal (Filing No. 11) and the United States’ Notice of Consent to Voluntary
Dismissal (Filing No. 12). The notices comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
41(a)(1)(A)(i), and the Court concludes that dismissal of the above-captioned action
should be approved. The Complaint in the above-captioned action should be dismissed
with prejudice as to Relator and without prejudice as to the United States. The Court
will not assess costs and attorney’s fees. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Relator Melanie Frazier’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Filing No. 11) and
the United States’ Notice of Consent to Voluntary Dismissal (Filing No. 12)
are approved;
2. The Complaint in the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice as to
Relator and without prejudice as to the United States; and
3. The Court will not assess costs and attorney’s fees.
Dated this 27th day of February, 2015
BY THE COURT:
s/Laurie Smith Camp
Chief United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?