Frazier et al v. Andrews et al

Filing 13

ORDER OF DISMISSAL - Relator Melanie Frazier's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Filing No. 11 ) and the United States Notice of Consent to Voluntary Dismissal (Filing No. 12 ) are approved. The Complaint in the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice as to Relator and without prejudice as to the United States. The Court will not assess costs and attorney's fees. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Ex Rel. Melanie Frazier, 8:14CV113 Plaintiffs, vs. ORDER OF DISMISSAL RICHARD V. ANDREWS, M.D.; RA NEUROLOGICAL, P.C.; ALEGENT CREIGHTON HEALTH, ALEGENT CREIGHTON HEALTH IMMANUEL MEDICAL CENTER f/k/a and d/b/a ALEGENT HEALTH-IMMANUEL MEDICAL CENTER d/b/a THE EPILEPSY CENTER, Defendants. This matter is before the Court on Relator Melanie Frazier’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Filing No. 11) and the United States’ Notice of Consent to Voluntary Dismissal (Filing No. 12). The notices comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), and the Court concludes that dismissal of the above-captioned action should be approved. The Complaint in the above-captioned action should be dismissed with prejudice as to Relator and without prejudice as to the United States. The Court will not assess costs and attorney’s fees. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. Relator Melanie Frazier’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Filing No. 11) and the United States’ Notice of Consent to Voluntary Dismissal (Filing No. 12) are approved; 2. The Complaint in the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice as to Relator and without prejudice as to the United States; and 3. The Court will not assess costs and attorney’s fees. Dated this 27th day of February, 2015 BY THE COURT: s/Laurie Smith Camp Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?