Padin v. Novartis Consumer Health
Filing
38
ORDER granting 37 Motion to Continue. Depositions due 8/14/2015.5-day Jury Trial set for 1/4/2016 at 09:00 AM before Judge John M. Gerrard. Pretrial Conference set for 12/15/2015 at 1:00 PM by WebEx Conference before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. Conferencing instructions have been provided at filing #36. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JOEL PADIN, an individual;
Plaintiff,
8:14CV120
vs.
ORDER
NOVARTIS CONSUMER HEALTH,
INC., a Foreign corporation;
Defendant.
IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue, (Filing No. 37), is granted, and the
progression order is amended as follows:
1)
To accommodate the deposition of John Peppmuller, the deposition
deadline is extended August 14, 2015.
2)
The dispositive motion deadline is extended to August 28, 2015.
3)
The jury trial of this case is set to commence before John M. Gerrard,
United States District Judge, in Courtroom 1, United States Courthouse, Lincoln,
Nebraska, at 9:00 a.m. on January 4, 2016, or as soon thereafter as the case may be
called, for a duration of five (5) trial days. This case is subject to the prior trial of
criminal cases and such other civil cases as may be scheduled for trial before this
one. Jury selection will be held at the commencement of trial.
4)
The Pretrial Conference is scheduled to be held before the undersigned
magistrate judge on December 15, 2015 at 1:00 p.m., and will be conducted by
WebEx conferencing. The instructions and codes for participating in the pretrial
conference by WebEx have been provided to counsel by text order, (Filing No.
36). The parties’ proposed Pretrial Conference Order and Exhibit List(s) must be
emailed to zwart@ned.uscourts.gov, in either Word Perfect or Word format, by
5:00 p.m. on December 14, 2015.
July 13, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?