Demos v. The U.S. Congress et al
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- Plaintiff's 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is denied. This matter is dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE U.S. CONGRESS, and PATTY
MURRAY,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
8:14CV125
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER
This matter is before the court on its own motion. On June 18, 2014, the court
required Plaintiff to show cause why he is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”)
pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). (Filing No. 5.) The court determined that
Plaintiff had filed three or more prior civil actions dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for
failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Id.) Plaintiff did not respond to the
court’s order, nor has he paid the court’s $400.00 filing and administrative fees. Accordingly,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP (Filing No. 2) is denied. This
matter is dismissed without prejudice.
2.
Order.
A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and
DATED this 28th day of July, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/ John M. Gerrard
United States District Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of
Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their
Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no
responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the
user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?