Valdez Diaz v. Espinoza Reyna

Filing 12

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Petitioner's Motion (Filing 9-2) for an Order Restricting Access to Petitioner's Index of Evidence is granted, and access to Petitioner's Index of Evidence (Filing 10 ) is limited to the parties, their attor neys, and the Court. Petitioner's Motion (Filing 9-1) to Withdraw Petitioner's previous Motion to File Documents Under Seal is granted, and Petitioners previous Motion to File Documents Under Seal (Filing 4 ) is denied as moot. Petition er's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Filing 2 ) is granted. The Court is currently considering Petitioner's request for appointment of an interpreter and will issue an order within the near future. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (TCL )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA CARLOS ERNESTO VALDEZ DIAZ, ) ) Plaintiff/Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) CONSUELO ESPINOZA REYNA, ) ) Defendant/Respondent. ) 8:14CV149 ORDER Petitioner, pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 5.3(c), has filed a Motion (Filing 9) for an Order Restricting Access to Petitioner’s Index of Evidence (Filing 10); a Motion (Filing 9) to Withdraw Petitioner’s previous Motion to File Documents Under Seal (Filing 4); and a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Filing 2). Because the personal identifiers which normally would be redacted pursuant Rule 5.2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure would eliminate information necessary for this Court’s proper consideration of the Petitioner’s Verified Complaint, Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, and supporting brief, Petitioner’s Motion for an Order Restricting Access shall be granted. Further, I find that Petitioner is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. Petitioner’s Motion (Filing 9-2) for an Order Restricting Access to Petitioner’s Index of Evidence is granted, and access to Petitioner’s Index of Evidence (Filing 10) is limited to the parties, their attorneys, and the Court; 2. Petitioner’s Motion (Filing 9-1) to Withdraw Petitioner’s previous Motion to File Documents Under Seal is granted, and Petitioner’s previous Motion to File Documents Under Seal (Filing 4) is denied as moot; 3. granted; Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Filing 2) is 4. The Court is currently considering Petitioner’s request for appointment of an interpreter and will issue an order within the near future. SO ORDERED this 15th day of May, 2014. BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?