Smith v. Gurstel Chargo, PA, et al

Filing 19

ORDER granting 17 Motion to Dismiss Party ; Plaintiff's claims against Todd Gurstel and Mitch Chargo are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Gurstel Chargo, P.A.'s deadline to answer or otherwise response to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to 30 days after the Court rules on the proposed settlement, should the settlement not be accepted. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
GARY D. SMITH, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly
situated,

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Plaintiff
vs.
GURSTEL CHARGO, PA,
TODD GURSTEL and
MITCH CHARGO,
Defendants

Case No.: 8:14-cv-00183-FG3

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS
TODD GURSTEL AND MITCH CHARGO WITHOUT PREJUDICE
AND TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR GURSTEL CHARGO TO ANSWER

THIS MATTER came before the Court on the joint motion of the parties to dismiss
without prejudice Plaintiff’s claims against Todd Gurstel and Mitch Chargo and to extend
Defendant Gurstel Chargo, P.A.’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint until the Court
rules on the proposed settlement. Upon good cause shown, the Court finds that the Motion
should be granted.
IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Plaintiff’s
claims against Todd Gurstel and Mitch Chargo are dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Gurstel Chargo, P.A.’s deadline to answer
or otherwise response to Plaintiff’s Complaint is extended to 30 days after the Court rules on the
proposed settlement, should the settlement not be accepted.
Dated this 23rd day of September, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
U.S. District Judge