Parsons, et al v. McCann, et al.
Filing
139
ORDER OF DISMISSAL that the Stipulated Dismissal, ECF No. 138 , is approved. The above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice. Any pending motions are terminated. The Court will not assess costs or attorneys fees. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (LAC)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
DAKOTA PARSONS, and DENICE
PARSONS,
8:14CV207
Plaintiffs,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
vs.
BLANE MCCANN, individually and as
Superintendent of Westside Community
Schools; KENT KINGSTON, individually
and as Executive Director of Westside
Community Schools; WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, BRENDA
BEADLE, individually and in her official
capacity as a Douglas County Attorney;
DON KLEINE, a Douglas County
Attorney; DOUGLAS COUNTY
ATTORNEY OFFICE, MARK FOXALL, as
Director of the Douglas County
Department of Corrections; CITY OF
OMAHA, OMAHA POLICE
DEPARTMENT, DOUGLAS COUNTY
NEBRASKA, a political subdivision of
the State; BOB BLANCHARD,
individually and in his capacity as
representative of the Young Adult
Court; NICK LURZ, individually and in
his capacity as representative of the
Young Adult Court; and JOHN DOES 1
THROUGH 15,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Stipulated Dismissal, ECF No. 138.
The Stipulation complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and the
Court concludes that it should be approved.
The above-captioned action will be
dismissed with prejudice, and the Court will not assess costs or attorney’s fees.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Stipulated Dismissal, ECF No. 138, is approved;
2. The above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice;
3. Any pending motions are terminated; and
4. The Court will not assess costs or attorney’s fees.
Dated this 28th day of February, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
s/Laurie Smith Camp
Chief United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?