Woodruff v. Foxall et al

Filing 10

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the plaintiff shall have 14 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to apprise the court of his current address in the absence of which this matter will be dismissed without further notice to Plaintiff. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: December 19, 2014: check for address. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JOHNNY R. WOODRUFF,
Petitioner,
v.
MARK FOXALL, et al.,
Respondents.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

8:14CV211

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On October 28, 2014, the Clerk
of the Court sent an order to Plaintiff at his last known address, which was returned as
undeliverable on November 6, 2014. (See Filing No. 9.) Plaintiff has an obligation to keep
the court informed of his current address at all times. See NEGenR 1.3(e) and (g) (requiring
pro se parties to adhere to local rules and inform the court of address changes within 30
days). This case cannot be prosecuted in this court if Plaintiff’s whereabouts remain
unknown.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff shall have 14 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to
apprise the court of his current address in the absence of which this matter will be dismissed
without further notice to Plaintiff.
2.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline
in this case using the following text: December 19, 2014: check for address.
DATED this 2nd day of December, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of
Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their
Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no
responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the
user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.