Harrold et al v. United States of America, et al
Filing
72
ORDER following a telephone conference with counsel. With the United States of America dismissed from the case, defendant City of Omaha will file a motion to dismiss or otherwise challenge the jurisdiction of the court. Such motion shall be filed by December 8, 2015. The court will hold a telephone conference with counsel to plan the progression of the case within ten business days of the court's ruling on the motion. Plaintiffs counsel shall arrange and initiate the telephone conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
CONNIE L. HARROLD and
GEOFFREY L. HARROLD,
8:14CV215
Plaintiffs,
vs.
ORDER
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA,
a municipal corporation,
Defendant.
This matter is before the court following a telephone conference with counsel on
November 30, 2015. Mark E. Novotny and Sarah M. Smith represented the plaintiffs
and Michelle A. Peters represented the defendant. With the United States of America
dismissed from the case, defendant City of Omaha will file a motion to dismiss or
otherwise challenge the jurisdiction of the court.
Such motion shall be filed by
December 8, 2015. The court will hold a telephone conference with counsel to plan the
progression of the case within ten business days of the court’s ruling on the motion.
Plaintiffs’ counsel shall arrange and initiate the telephone conference.
DATED this 30th day of November, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?