Purdy v. Foxhall et al

Filing 14

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff must update his address within 30 days. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action without further notice to Plaintiff. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 3/27/2015:check for address) Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
ANTHONY P. PURDY,
Plaintiff,
v.
MARK FOXHALL, JHON
HUBBARD, PAT WEST, Cpt,
EARLEY, Cpt, MENTAL HEALTH
STAFF, DRS OF CCS, CITY OF
OMAHA, DOUGLAS COUNTY,
DOUGLAS COUNTY
CORRECTIONS CENTER, CCS?,
Medical Corporation process, and
CCA,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

8:14CV236

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On February 13, 2015, the
clerk of the court sent an order to Plaintiff at his last known address and it was
returned to this court as undeliverable. (See Case No. 8:14CV240, Filing No. 13.)
Plaintiff has an obligation to keep the court informed of his current address at all
times. See NEGenR 1.3(e) and (g) (requiring pro se parties to adhere to local rules
and inform the court of address changes within 30 days). This case cannot be
prosecuted in this court if Plaintiff’s whereabouts remain unknown.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff must update his address within 30 days. Failure to do so will
result in dismissal of this action without further notice to Plaintiff.

2.
The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management
deadline in this case using the following text: March 27, 2015: check for address.
DATED this 24th day of February, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/ John M. Gerrard
United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District
of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they
provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The
court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases
to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.

2