Purdy v. State of Nebraska et al

Filing 14

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiff must update his address within 30 days. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action without further notice to Plaintiff. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: March 27, 2015: check for address. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
ANTHONY P. PURDY,
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF NEBRASKA, PUBLIC
DEFENDER’S OFFICE, CITY OF
OMAHA, MARK FOXHALL,
Manager, DOUGLAS COUNTY,
JOHN HUBBARD, Manager,
DOUGLAS COUNTY COURT,
JOHN M. FRIEND, TRAVIS
WAPPLER, MARK MANCUSSO,
OMAHA POLICE DEPARTMENT,
JEFFREY DAVIS, COS, FRANCIS
LIDDICK, and CORBET, CRS,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

8:14CV240

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On February 13, 2015, the
clerk of the court sent an order to Plaintiff at his last known address and it was
returned to this court as undeliverable. (See Filing No. 13.) Plaintiff has an
obligation to keep the court informed of his current address at all times. See NEGenR
1.3(e) and (g) (requiring pro se parties to adhere to local rules and inform the court
of address changes within 30 days). This case cannot be prosecuted in this court if
Plaintiff’s whereabouts remain unknown.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff must update his address within 30 days. Failure to do so will
result in dismissal of this action without further notice to Plaintiff.

2.
The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management
deadline in this case using the following text: March 27, 2015: check for address.
DATED this 2nd day of March, 2015.
BY THE COURT:

s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
Senior United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District
of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they
provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The
court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases
to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.

2