Cartwright v. State of Nebraska, City of Sidney, Cheyenne County et al

Filing 90

ORDER granting the Plaintiff's 88 Motion to Extend. Plaintiff shall have until March 29, 2016, to file a response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 84 . Defendants shall have until April 5, 2016, to file a reply. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JENNIFER LYNN CARTWRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SIDNEY, NEBRASKA, JORDAN BALL, JONY MATHEWS, and GARY PEARSON, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:14CV246 Order This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Enlarge Time to File Response (Filing No. 88) to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 84) filed on February 26, 2016. Plaintiff’s response was due on March 18, 2016. See NECivR. 7.1(b)(1)(B). Although Plaintiff’s motion was dated March 18, 2016, it was filed out of time on March 21, 2016. Plaintiff states she was unable to file a timely response due to an unexpected medical emergency which required her hospitalization. Defendants’ objections (Filing No. 89) to Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time are well-taken. However, because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and has shown good cause for her failure to timely file the instant motion, the court will grant her motion to enlarge time. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion (Filing No. 88) is granted. Plaintiff shall have until March 29, 2016, to file a response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 84). 2. Defendants shall have until April 5, 2016, to file a reply. DATED: March 18, 2016. BY THE COURT: S/ F.A. Gossett United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?