ACI Worldwide Corp. v. Churchill Lane Associates, LLC
Filing
143
ORDER - ACI shall have an extension of time to October 16, 2017, to file a response to Churchill's Motion to Compel (Filing No. 135 ). Churchill may file a reply to the response on or before October 30, 2017. The Court will set the remaining ca se progression deadlines, including those related to discovery, summary judgment motions, expert disclosures, pretrial disclosures, and motions in limine, and a trial date, after ruling on the Motion to Compel. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (KLF)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
ACI WORLDWIDE CORP.,
Plaintiff,
8:14CV249
vs.
ORDER
CHURCHILL LANE ASSOCIATES, LLC,
Defendant.
This matter is before the Court following a Scheduling Conference held with counsel for
the parties on September 29, 2017. The Court discussed further scheduling of the case to trial and
reviewed both parties’ proposed progression orders. The Court also discussed briefing schedules
for Churchill’s pending Motion to Compel (Filing No. 135) and a motion for partial summary
judgment that ACI anticipates filing on or before October 16, 2017. The Court agreed to extend
the parties’ response and reply deadlines with regard to the Motion to Compel. Under the
circumstances, further case progression deadlines will be set in the order ruling on the Motion to
Compel. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. ACI shall have an extension of time to October 16, 2017, to file a response to
Churchill’s Motion to Compel (Filing No. 135). Churchill may file a reply to the response on or
before October 30, 2017.
2. The Court will set the remaining case progression deadlines, including those related to
discovery, summary judgment motions, expert disclosures, pretrial disclosures, and motions in
limine, and a trial date, after ruling on the Motion to Compel.
DATED this 29th day of September, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Michael D. Nelson
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?