Cambara Cambara et al v. Schlote et al
Filing
123
ORDER: Notice regarding topics at issue during the telephonic conference scheduled for March 21, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JLK)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
RUBEN CAMBARA CAMBARA, et al,
Plaintiffs,
8:14CV260
vs.
ORDER
AMBER SCHLOTE et al,
Defendants.
On March 21, 2018, the undersigned is scheduled to hold an on the record
telephonic conference in the above captioned case. For clarity, the court believes
the following topics will be at issue:
1) Whether, or to what extent, Plaintiff shall supplement expert
disclosures (Filing No. 121) to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a).
Specifically:
a. Defendants allege that, regarding three of the six disclosed
experts, Plaintiff did not provide full and timely disclosures.
Plaintiff indicates that “reports are being translated and
produced.” (Id. at CM/ECF p. 1).
b. Defendants also identify alleged deficiencies in the expert
disclosures regarding: a) Dr. Mark J. Shuman; b) Judge
Michael D. Nelson; and c) Douglas County Attorney Don
Kleine. Defendants allege that Plaintiff failed to fully disclose
these non-retained experts as required by the federal rules.
2) Whether further expert deadlines should be extended pending
resolution of the allegations above. Defendants’ complete expert
disclosures are currently due June 1, 2018, with rebuttal expert
disclosures due July 1, 2018. (Filing No. 107).
3) Whether, or to what extent, Plaintiff shall supplement answers
regarding
the
alleged
fabricated
evidence
and
exculpatory
information that was omitted from reports, ignored, and not disclosed
by the Douglas County actors.
4) The general completeness of discovery responses to date and
proposed amendments to the current progression schedule (Filing
No. 107).
Dated this 20th day of March, 2018.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?