Cambara Cambara et al v. Schlote et al

Filing 123

ORDER: Notice regarding topics at issue during the telephonic conference scheduled for March 21, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JLK)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA RUBEN CAMBARA CAMBARA, et al, Plaintiffs, 8:14CV260 vs. ORDER AMBER SCHLOTE et al, Defendants. On March 21, 2018, the undersigned is scheduled to hold an on the record telephonic conference in the above captioned case. For clarity, the court believes the following topics will be at issue: 1) Whether, or to what extent, Plaintiff shall supplement expert disclosures (Filing No. 121) to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a). Specifically: a. Defendants allege that, regarding three of the six disclosed experts, Plaintiff did not provide full and timely disclosures. Plaintiff indicates that “reports are being translated and produced.” (Id. at CM/ECF p. 1). b. Defendants also identify alleged deficiencies in the expert disclosures regarding: a) Dr. Mark J. Shuman; b) Judge Michael D. Nelson; and c) Douglas County Attorney Don Kleine. Defendants allege that Plaintiff failed to fully disclose these non-retained experts as required by the federal rules. 2) Whether further expert deadlines should be extended pending resolution of the allegations above. Defendants’ complete expert disclosures are currently due June 1, 2018, with rebuttal expert disclosures due July 1, 2018. (Filing No. 107). 3) Whether, or to what extent, Plaintiff shall supplement answers regarding the alleged fabricated evidence and exculpatory information that was omitted from reports, ignored, and not disclosed by the Douglas County actors. 4) The general completeness of discovery responses to date and proposed amendments to the current progression schedule (Filing No. 107). Dated this 20th day of March, 2018. BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?