Cambara Cambara et al v. Schlote et al
Filing
180
ORDER - The claims filed by Plaintiff Keny Medrano Cambara, Individually and on behalf of the minor children Angie Cambara Medrano and Diana Cambara Medrano, are dismissed for want of prosecution. A separate Judgment will be entered. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (LKO)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
KENY MEDRANO CAMBARA,
Individually and on behalf of the
minor children Angie Cambara
Medrano and Diana Cambara
Medrano;
8:14CV260
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff,
vs.
AMBER SCHLOTE, et al.;
Defendants.
On August 9, 2018, Plaintiffs’ counsel moved to withdraw on behalf of
Plaintiff Keny Medrano Cambara. Counsel explained that Plaintiff Keny
Medrano Cambara was not communicating with counsel or responding to
emails, calls or text messages. (Filing No. 169).
The motion to withdraw was granted, and Keny Medrano Cambara was
granted until September 10, 2018 to “either (a) obtain the services of counsel
and have that attorney file an appearance in this case; or (b) file a statement
notifying the court of her intent to litigate this case without the assistance of
counsel.” (Filing No. 170). She was warned that failing to comply may result in
dismissal of her claims without further notice. Id. Plaintiff Keny Medrano
Cambara failed to comply with the court’s order.1
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
The claims filed by Plaintiff Keny Medrano Cambara, Individually
and on behalf of the minor children Angie Cambara Medrano and
Diana Cambara Medrano, are dismissed for want of prosecution;
and
2.
A separate Judgment will be entered.
September 27, 2018.
BY THE COURT:
s/ John M. Gerrard
United States District Judge
The order was mailed to Plaintiff Keny Medrano Cambara at all last
known mail and email addresses as provided by her former counsel. The
mailing to the Guatemala address was returned as undeliverable.
1
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?