Hightower v. State of Nebraska et al

Filing 6

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Complaint (Filing No. 1 ) is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to comply with this court's orders. A separate Judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
PARIS HIGHTOWER,
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF NEBRASKA, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

8:14CV263

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On September 9, 2014, Plaintiff
filed his Complaint in this matter. (Filing No. 1.) However, Plaintiff failed to pay the filing
fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (See Docket Sheet.) On
September 11, 2014, the court directed Plaintiff to either tender the $400.00 filing and
administrative fees to the Clerk of the Court or submit a request to proceed in forma
pauperis. (Filing No. 5.) The court warned Plaintiff that failure to comply with the court’s
order within 30 days would result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice.
Plaintiff did not respond. (See Docket Sheet.)
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s Complaint (Filing No. 1) is dismissed without prejudice because
Plaintiff failed to comply with this court’s orders.
2.

A separate Judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and

Order.
DATED this 3rd day of December, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of
Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their
Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no
responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the
user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.