Lee v. Walman Optical Company

Filing 56

ORDER that pursuant to the parties joint stipulation 55 , and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), all counterclaims alleged by Defendant, WalmanOptical Company, against Plaintiff, Scott Lee, are dismissed withprejudice, each party to pay its own costs and fees. Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on Defendants counterclaims 44 is denied without prejudice. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KLF)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA SCOTT LEE, Plaintiff, v. WALMAN OPTICAL COMPANY, a Minnesota Corporation, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:14CV272 ORDER IT IS ORDERED: 1. Pursuant to the parties’ joint stipulation (filing 55), and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), all counterclaims alleged by Defendant, Walman Optical Company, against Plaintiff, Scott Lee, are dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay its own costs and fees. 2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on Defendant’s counterclaims (filing 44) is denied without prejudice. DATED this 27th day of August, 2015. BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?