Stafford v. Department of the Navy (DoN) Board for Correction of Naval Records et al

Filing 14

ORDER denying 13 Motion to Add 3rd Supplement to the Plaintiff's Pro Se Amended Complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MLF, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

LARRY RAY STAFFORD,
Plaintiff,
vs.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY (DON)
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS and
SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
COUNCIL OF REVIEW BOARDS,

8:14CV279
ORDER

Defendants.
This matter is before the court on the plaintiff’s Motion to Add 3rd Supplement to
Plaintiff’s Pro Se Amended Complaint (Filing No. 13). In this matter, the plaintiff filed his
Complaint on September 17, 2014, followed by an Amended Complaint on October 10,
2014. Subsequently, the plaintiff filed motions to supplement those complaints. The
court granted leave for the plaintiff to serve the defendants with the Amended Complaint
and for simultaneous consideration of the first and second supplements. The plaintiff’s
current motion seeks to add, as evidence against the defendants, conduct which
occurred in January 2015 by a non-party. Evidence collected by the plaintiff need not,
and in fact, should not, be filed at this time. After the defendants are served with the
plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, they may file an answer or motion. The plaintiff will have
an opportunity to respond to any motion filed by the defendants. If appropriate, the
court will then set a progression order providing with the parties with time for discovery
and evidence may only be filed in relation to various motions as allowed under the local
and federal rules. Accordingly, the plaintiff’s third motion to supplement is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 14th day of January, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge