Stafford v. Department of the Navy (DoN) Board for Correction of Naval Records et al
Filing
30
ORDER that the Findings and Recommendation 29 is adopted in its entirety; the defendants' 23 Motion to transfer is granted and the Clerk of the Court is directed to transfer this case to the United States Court of Federal Claims; and the plaintiff's 26 Motion to Strike is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
LARRY RAY STAFFORD,
Plaintiff,
8:14CV279
vs.
ORDER
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY (DON) BOARD
FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS,
SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF
REVIEW BOARDS, Combat-Related Special
Compensation Branch;
Defendants.
Before the court is the Findings and Recommendation (“F&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge
Thalken, Filing No. 29, recommending that this court grant the defendants’ Motion to Transfer (Filing No.
23) and deny the plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendants’ Motion to Transfer (Filing No. 26). The court
notes that all parties agree to this transfer. Pursuant to NECivR 41.2 , the court has conducted a de novo
review of the record and adopts the F&R in its entirety.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1.
The F&R (Filing No. 29) is adopted in its entirety; and
2.
The defendants’ Motion to Transfer (Filing No. 23) is granted and the Clerk of the Court is
directed to transfer this case to the United States Court of Federal Claims; and
3.
The plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendants’ Motion to Transfer (Filing No. 26) is denied.
Dated this 31st day of March, 2015
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?