JDR Industries, Inc. v. McDowell et al

Filing 112

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation (filing 108 ) are adopted. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a default against defendant J.L. Vance, L.L.C. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party ) (LAC) Modified on 1/27/2016 to include copy mailed to pro se party. (LAC).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JDR INDUSTRIES, INC.,
Plaintiff,

8:14-CV-284

vs.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
EDWIN K. McDOWELL, et al.,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Findings and
Recommendation (filing 108) recommending that the Court file an entry of
default against the defendant J.L. Vance, L.L.C.
The defendant has not objected to the Magistrate Judge's
recommendation. Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) provides for de novo review of a
Magistrate Judge's findings or recommendations only when a party objects to
them. Peretz v. United States, 501 U.S. 923 (1991). Failure to object to a finding
of fact in a Magistrate Judge's recommendation may be construed as a waiver of
the right to object from the district court's order adopting the recommendation of
the finding of fact. NECivR 72.2(f). And the failure to file an objection eliminates
not only the need for de novo review, but any review by the Court. Thomas v.
Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Leonard v. Dorsey & Whitney LLP, 553 F.3d 609 (8th
Cir. 2009); see also United States v. Meyer, 439 F.3d 855, 858-59 (8th Cir. 2006).
Accordingly, the Court will adopt the Magistrate Judge's recommendation that a
default be entered against the defendant J.L. Vance, L.L.C.
IT IS ORDERED:
1.

The Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation (filing
108) are adopted.

2.

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a default against
defendant J.L. Vance, L.L.C.

Dated this 27th day of January, 2016.
BY THE COURT:
John M. Gerrard
United States District Judge