JDR Industries, Inc. v. McDowell et al

Filing 90

ORDER granting 89 Email Motion for Telephone Conference.1) Plaintiff's Motion for Telephone Conference, (Filing No. 89 ), is granted. Telephone Conference is set for 11/19/2015 at 3:30 pm.2) Counsel for the Plaintiff shall no tify pro se defendants, James L. Vance and J.L. Vance, L.L.C. of the telephone conference and file poof of notice with the Court.3) Call-in instructions will be filed separately. Counsel for the Plaintiff shall provide instructions to pro se defendants, once filed.4) The parties are instructed to provide the undersigned a brief summary of the disputed issues, no more than 10 pages, on or before 11/18/2015.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JDR INDUSTRIES, INC., a Nebraska corporation; 8:14CV284 Plaintiff, vs. ORDER EDWIN K. MCDOWELL, LAGRANGE SUPPLY CO, L.L.C., a Nebraska limited liability company; JAMES L. VANCE, AND J.L. VANCE, L.L.C., a Nebraska limited liability company; Defendants. Counsel for the Plaintiff, JDR Industries Inc., has filed a motion for a telephone conference to discuss discovery matters with pro se defendants James L. Vance and J.L. Vance, L.L.C. (Filing No. 89). THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS: 1) Plaintiff’s Motion for Telephone Conference, (Filing No. 89), is granted. Telephone Conference is set for 11/19/2015 at 3:30 pm. 2) Counsel for the Plaintiff shall notify pro se defendants, James L. Vance and J.L. Vance, L.L.C. of the telephone conference and file poof of notice with the Court. 3) Call-in instructions will be filed separately. Counsel for the Plaintiff shall provide instructions to pro se defendants, once filed. 4) The parties are instructed to provide the undersigned a brief summary of the disputed issues, no more than 10 pages, on or before 11/18/2015 November 6, 2015. BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?