Sempek v. I.Q. Data International, Inc. et al

Filing 24

ORDER on or before October 23, 2015, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, at bataillon@ned.uscourts.gov, a draft order w hich will fully dispose of the case. If the case is being dismissed, the stipulation shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) and shall state whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. 3. The previously scheduled pretrial conference and trial are cancelled upon the representation that this case is settled.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MLF, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ASHLEY M. SEMPEK, Plaintiff, 8:15CV09 vs. ORDER I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Defendants. Upon notice of settlement (Filing No. 23) given to the magistrate judge on September 9, 2015, by Burke Smith, counsel for the plaintiff, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. On or before October 23, 2015, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, at bataillon@ned.uscourts.gov, a draft order which will fully dispose of the case. If the case is being dismissed, the stipulation shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) and shall state whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice. 2. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. 3. The previously scheduled pretrial conference and trial are cancelled upon the representation that this case is settled. Dated this 10th day of September, 2015. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?