Peterson v. USDA, et al.

Filing 20

ORDER - The parties shall have until August 11, 2015, to file any motion supplement the administrative record. The plaintiff shall have until September 10, 2015, to review the record and serve any requests for discovery. The plaintiff shall have until October 13, 2015, to file a motion for summary judgment. The defendant shall have until November 12, 2015, to respond to the plaintiff's motion and file a cross-motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff shall have until November 23, 2015, to file a reply. Should the court require any further proceedings in the matter, the parties will be notified by the court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ROBERT PETERSON, Plaintiff, vs. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, and THOMAS J. VILSACK, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture, 8:15CV40 ORDER Defendants. This matter is before the court on the parties’ Rule 26(f) Report (Filing No. 18). This being an appeal of a final agency action, the matter is appropriate for disposition by dispositive motion. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The parties shall have until August 11, 2015, to file any motion to supplement the administrative record. 2. The plaintiff shall have until September 10, 2015, to review the record and serve any requests for discovery. 3. The plaintiff shall have until October 13, 2015, to file a motion for summary judgment. 4. The defendant shall have until November 12, 2015, to respond to the plaintiff’s motion and file a cross-motion for summary judgment. 5. The plaintiff shall have until November 23, 2015, to file a reply. 6. Should the court require any further proceedings in the matter, the parties will be notified by the court. Dated this 12th day of June, 2015. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?