Klug v. Watts Regulator Company, et al
Filing
28
ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Watts Water Technologies, Inc. is hereby dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Watts Regulator Company shall have until June 2 6, 2015, to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff has the right to file a further amendment as a matter of course under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRAKSA
CURTIS KLUG, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated,
Case No.: 8:15-cv-00061-JFB-TDT
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
WATTS REGULATOR COMPANY and WATTS
WATER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendants.
This matter comes before the Court upon the Joint Stipulation Dismissing Defendant
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. And Extending Time For Response To Complaint, Filing No.
23. The Court finds that the stipulation, Filing No. 23, should be granted.
IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Watts
Water Technologies, Inc. is hereby dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Watts
Regulator Company shall have until June 26, 2015, to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the
Complaint.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff has the right
to file a further amendment as a matter of course under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of June, 2015.
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?