Fjellin et al v. Frauenshuh Hospitality Group of Minnesota

Filing 57

ORDER regarding Order 54 . Third Party Defendant Four M Corporation is given until April 11, 2016 to show cause why the court should not enter a default and/or default judgment against it without further notice. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JACQUELINE C. FJELLIN, AND for and as Trustees of the Leonard Van Liew Living Trust; and JAMES J. VAN LIEW, for and as Trustees of the Leonard Van Liew Living Trust; 8:15CV67 ORDER Plaintiffs, vs. FRAUENSHUH HOSPITALITY GROUP OF MINNESOTA, a Minnesota limited liability company; Defendant. Third Party Defendant Four M Corporation’s counsel was granted leave to withdraw on January 19, 2016. Third Party Defendant Four M Corporation was given until February 9, 2017 to obtain the services of counsel and have that attorney file an appearance on its behalf, and was warned that if it failed to do so, the court may file an entry and/or judgment of default against it without further notice. The order was mailed to Four M Corporation on January 19, 2016. The order was returned undeliverable and was resent to a different address on February 16, 2016. (Filing No. 54). The second mailing has not been returned. To date, Third Party Defendant Four M Corporation failed to appoint new counsel. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Third Party Defendant Four M Corporation is given until April 11, 2016 to show cause why the court should not enter a default and/or default judgment against it without further notice. 2) The clerk shall mail a copy of this order to Third Party Defendant Four M Corporation at: Four M. Corporation c/o Be, Inc. 1248 O Street, Suite 600 Lincoln, NE 68508 Dated this 21st day of March, 2016 BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?