Chrisp v. Saunders County Jail et al
Filing
1
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff's claims against the Saunders County Jail and Saunders County, Nebraska, are severed into a new case. That new case shall be captioned: CAMERON CHRISP, Plaintiff, vs. SAUNDERS COUNTY JAIL, AND SAUNDERS COUNTY, NEBRASKA, Defendants. The new severed case shall be assigned to the undersigned judge for further proceedings. The clerk of the court is directed to file the following documents in the new case: this order; the original Complaint (Filing No. 1); Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No.8), which should be pending at the time the case is opened; and any other notices and general orders that are filed in pro se cases as a matter of course (e.g., the "NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint by a pro se party"). Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JSF)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
CAMERON CHRISP,
Plaintiff,
v.
LANCASTER COUNTY JAIL, and
SAUNDERS COUNTY JAIL,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
8:14CV344
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s request for the appointment counsel
(Filing No. 25) and motions seeking leave to sever some of his claims into a separate
action. (Filing Nos. 17, 24, and 25.)
A.
Motion to Appoint Counsel
Plaintiff seeks the appointment of counsel. The court cannot routinely appoint
counsel in civil cases. In Davis v. Scott, 94 F.3d 444, 447 (8th Cir. 1996), the Eighth
Circuit Court of Appeals explained that “[i]ndigent civil litigants do not have a
constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel. The trial court has broad
discretion to decide whether both the plaintiff and the court will benefit from the
appointment of counsel[.]” Id. (internal citation and quotation marks omitted). No such
benefit is apparent here at this time. Thus, the request for the appointment of counsel
will be denied without prejudice to reassertion.
B.
Motion to Sever Claims and Name Additional Defendants
Plaintiff named the Lancaster County Jail and Saunders County Jail as
Defendants in this action. He asks the court to sever his claims against Defendants
into two separate actions. He also seeks leave to name Lancaster County, Nebraska,
as a defendant in this matter, and leave to name Saunders County, Nebraska, as a
defendant in the separate case.
The court will grant Plaintiff’s request to sever claims as set forth below. In
addition, the court will grant Plaintiff’s requests to name Lancaster County, Nebraska,
as a defendant in this action, and name Saunders County, Nebraska, in the severed
action.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel (Filing No. 25) is
denied without prejudice.
2.
Plaintiff’s requests to sever claims (Filing No. 17 and Filing No. 24) are
granted only to the extent set forth below.
3.
Plaintiff’s requests to name additional defendants is granted.
4.
Plaintiff’s claims against the Saunders County Jail and Saunders County,
Nebraska, are severed into a new case. That new case shall be captioned: CAMERON
CHRISP, Plaintiff, vs. SAUNDERS COUNTY JAIL, AND SAUNDERS COUNTY,
NEBRASKA, Defendants. The new severed case shall be assigned to the undersigned
judge for further proceedings. The clerk of the court is directed to file the following
documents in the new case:
•
this order;
•
the original Complaint (Filing No. 1);
•
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No.
8), which should be pending at the time the case is opened; and
•
any other notices and general orders that are filed in pro se cases as a
matter of course (e.g., the “NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of
complaint by a pro se party”).
2
5.
The clerk’s office is directed to terminate Saunders County Jail as a
defendant in this action and add Lancaster County, Nebraska, as a defendant in this
action in accordance with this Memorandum and Order.
DATED this 4th day of March, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District
of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they
provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The
court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases
to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?