Hasenbank v. State of Nebraska

Filing 39

ORDER - After conferring with the plaintiff and counsel for the defendant, deadlines set as stated herein.- If the case is not dismissed by summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity, within 10 days after the court's summary judgment ruling, Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant shall contact my chambers to further discuss case scheduling deadlines. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
HEATHER HASENBANK,
Plaintiff,

8:15CV88

vs.
ORDER
RYAN MARTIN,
Defendant.
After conferring with the plaintiff and counsel for the defendant,
IT IS ORDERED:
1)
Discovery may proceed as to the issue of qualified immunity only.
Discovery on all other issues is not permitted at this time.
2)
As to the issue of qualified immunity, any written discovery shall be served
on or before June 15, 2016. Any motions to compel Rule 33 through 36 discovery must
be filed by August 1, 2016. Note: Motions to compel shall not be filed without first
contacting the chambers of the undersigned magistrate judge to set a conference for
discussing the parties’ dispute.
3)
As to the issue of qualified immunity, any depositions shall be completed
on or before August 22, 2016.
4)
Motions for summary judgment on the issue of qualified immunity shall be
filed on or before September 21, 2016.
5)
If the case is not dismissed by summary judgment on the basis of qualified
immunity, within 10 days after the court’s summary judgment ruling, Plaintiff and
counsel for Defendant shall contact my chambers to further discuss case scheduling
deadlines.
April 21, 2016.

BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge