Jones v. State of Nebraska
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
RONALD J. JONES,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF NEBRASKA,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
8:15CV94
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER
Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing No. 1) and a Motion for
Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 2). Habeas corpus cases attacking the legality
of a person’s confinement require the payment of a $5.00 filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).
However, after considering Petitioner’s financial status as shown in the records of this court
(see inmate trust account statement at Filing No. 4), provisional leave to proceed in forma
pauperis will be granted and Petitioner is relieved from paying the filing fee at this time. See
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in
Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 2) is granted. The next step in this case is for the court to conduct
a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules
Governing Section 2254 cases. The court will conduct this review in its normal course of
business.
DATED this 13th day of March, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
Senior United States District Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of
Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their
Web sites. Likewis e, t he court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no
responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user
to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?