McPherson v. Frakes

Filing 22

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - that Petitioner's motion for post-judgment relief (filing no. 21 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
ROGER MCPHERSON,
Petitioner,

8:15CV162

vs.
SCOTT R. FRAKES, and MICHAEL L.
KENNEY,

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

Respondents.
This matter is before the court on Petitioner Roger McPherson’s
(“Petitioner” or “McPherson”) “Direct Challenge to Judge Richard G. Kopf’s
Ruling(s)” (filing no. 21), which the court construes as a motion for relief from
judgment under Rule 60(b). In the motion, McPherson asks the court to reopen this
closed habeas case and reverse the court’s previous denial of his habeas petition
based on the same arguments put forth in his previous Motion to Reopen Case.
(See Filing No. 16.)
I carefully considered and rejected McPherson’s arguments when I denied
his first motion for post-judgment relief, and I remain unconvinced that McPherson
is entitled to any type of post-judgment relief based on the record and information
he has presented. For the reasons stated in the January 31, 2018 Memorandum and
Order denying McPherson’s previous motion (filing no. 19), which I fully
incorporate herein, McPherson’s present motion for post-judgment relief is denied.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for post-judgment
relief (filing no. 21) is denied.

Dated this 16th day of April, 2018.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge

2