Parker v. Colvin

Filing 4

ORDER granting the plaintiff's 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; accordingly, the plaintiff shall be allowed to proceed without payment of the filing fee. The U.S. Marshal shall serve the summons and Complaint without payment of costs or fees. Service may be by certified mail pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and Nebraska law in the discretion of the U.S. Marshal. To obtain service of process on the defendant, the plaintiff must complete and return three summons forms a nd three USM-285 forms. Upon receipt of the completed forms, the Clerk of the court will sign the summons forms, to be forwarded with copies of the Complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service of process. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (Copy mailed to counsel)(MKR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA BUDDY PARKER, Plaintiff, 8:15CV186 vs. ORDER CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. This matter is before the court on the plaintiff’s Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 3). Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The plaintiff’s Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 3) is granted; accordingly, the plaintiff shall be allowed to proceed without payment of the filing fee. 2. The U.S. Marshal shall serve the summons and Complaint without payment of costs or fees. Service may be by certified mail pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and Nebraska law in the discretion of the U.S. Marshal. 3. To obtain service of process on the defendant, the plaintiff must complete and return three summons forms and three USM-285 forms. Upon receipt of the completed forms, the Clerk of the court will sign the summons forms, to be forwarded with copies of the Complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service of process. Dated this 2nd day of June, 2015. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?