Goodman v. Pollack et al

Filing 24

ORDER that plaintiff's 20 Motion to Amend is granted; Defendants Sanfford Pollack, State of Nebraska, and Brody Duncan are dismissed without prejudice; defendant Pollack's 14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is denied as moot. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy e-mailed to pro se party)(ADB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA CLETIS GOODMAN, Plaintiff, 8:15CV220 vs. ORDER SANFFORD POLLACK; JENNIFER STEHLIK LADMAN; BRODY DUNCAN; STATE OF NEBRASKA; SEWARD COUNTY, NEBRASKA; SEWARD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, Defendants. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal which was filed as a supplemental motion to amend (Filing No. 20). The plaintiff voluntarily dismisses without prejudice any claims against defendants Sanfford Pollack, State of Nebraska, and Brody Duncan. The Court notes that no objections have been filed and finds that the motion should be granted. IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1) Plaintiff’s motion to amend (Filing No. 20) is granted; and 2) Defendants Sanfford Pollack, State of Nebraska, and Brody Duncan are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT: 1) Defendant Sanfford Pollack’s motion to dismiss (Filing No. 14) is denied as moot. Dated this 17th day of August, 2015 BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?