Goodman v. Pollack et al
ORDER that plaintiff's 20 Motion to Amend is granted; Defendants Sanfford Pollack, State of Nebraska, and Brody Duncan are dismissed without prejudice; defendant Pollack's 14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is denied as moot. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy e-mailed to pro se party)(ADB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
SANFFORD POLLACK; JENNIFER STEHLIK
LADMAN; BRODY DUNCAN; STATE OF
NEBRASKA; SEWARD COUNTY,
NEBRASKA; SEWARD COUNTY SHERIFF'S
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal which was filed
as a supplemental motion to amend (Filing No. 20). The plaintiff voluntarily dismisses without
prejudice any claims against defendants Sanfford Pollack, State of Nebraska, and Brody
Duncan. The Court notes that no objections have been filed and finds that the motion should be
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
Plaintiff’s motion to amend (Filing No. 20) is granted; and
Defendants Sanfford Pollack, State of Nebraska, and Brody Duncan are
dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT:
1) Defendant Sanfford Pollack’s motion to dismiss (Filing No. 14) is denied as moot.
Dated this 17th day of August, 2015
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?