Rush v. Zimmerman et al

Filing 12

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : Plaintiff must update his address within 30 days. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action without further notice to Plaintiff. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: September 1, 2015: check for address. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
CLIFFORD L. RUSH,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
J. ZIMMERMAN, MICHAEL
THURBER, and SHAFER, Sgt.,
Defendants.

8:15CV236

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On July 29, 2015, the clerk of the
court received correspondence from the Lancaster County Department of Corrections indicating
Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated there. (See Filing No. 11.) Plaintiff has an obligation to keep
the court informed of his current address at all times. See NEGenR 1.3(e) and (g) (requiring
pro se parties to adhere to local rules and inform the court of address changes within 30 days).
This case cannot be prosecuted in this court if Plaintiff’s whereabouts remain unknown.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff must update his address within 30 days. Failure to do so will result in
dismissal of this action without further notice to Plaintiff.
2.
The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this
case using the following text: September 1, 2015: check for address.
DATED this 30th day of July, 2015.
BY THE COURT:

s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
Senior United States District Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska
does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites.
Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the
availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does
not affect the opinion of the court.