Zhao et al v. Huang
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Motion for Default Judgment, ECF No. 20 , is construed as a motion for clerk's entry of default under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) and is referred to the Clerk of Court. In the event the Clerk of Court enters a default a gainst Defendant Ji Feng Huang: a. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum and Order as well as the entry of default to the address listed below: Ji Feng Huang, 38-1 Nanfugong, Yunfeng RD, Baiyun District, Guiyang City Guiz hou, China 550014. b. Defendant Ji Feng Huang must respond to Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment, ECF No. 20 , within fourteen days after the Clerk of Court's entry of default; and c. The Clerk of Court is directed not to terminate the Motion that appears at ECF No. 20, but to set a response deadline of fourteen days from the date of the entry of default. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
ZEMIN ZHAO, AND an individual; and
ZHONG LING CHEN, an individual;
JI FENG HUANG, an individual;
This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Default Judgment, ECF No. 20,
filed by Plaintiffs Zemin Zhao and Zhong Ling Chen. For the reasons stated below, the
Motion for Default Judgment will be construed as a Motion for a Clerk’s Entry of Default.
Between November of 2013 and October of 2014, Plaintiffs made three loans
(collectively “Loans”) to Defendant Ji Feng Huang, totaling $259,650.97, at an interest
rate of three percent per month. Amended Complaint ¶¶ 1–5, ECF No. 15, Page ID 65.
Huang signed promissory notes for each of the Loans and agreed to repay them within
one year. Id. On November 18, 2015, after failing to pay any amount on the Loans,
Plaintiffs and Huang entered into an agreement, by which Huang agreed to a modified
repayment schedule of the entire amount due, which then totaled $372,536.05, plus
twelve percent annual interest. Id. ¶¶ 7–8. Huang timely made the first payment of the
modified schedule, $65,573.77, but defaulted on the second payment, which was due
on November 30, 2015. Id. ¶ 9–10.
Plaintiffs filed in this Court on August 3, 2015, ECF No. 1, and amended their
complaint on February 15, 2016. ECF No. 15. At the filing of the Amended Complaint,
Huang owed Plaintiffs an amount totaling $306,962.28, plus interest from the November
30, 2015, default. Id. ¶ 11. After several months, service was executed upon Huang in
China. ECF No. 19. On December 8, 2016, Plaintiffs filed their Motion for Default
Judgment. ECF No. 20. That same day, Plaintiffs filed an affidavit of Plaintiff Zemin
Zhao, ECF No. 21, in which Zhao stated that since the filing of the Amended Complaint,
Huang had made two delinquent payments,1 which Plaintiffs accepted. Zhao Affidavit
¶¶ 14–19, ECF No. 21, Page ID 91. Based on the delinquent payments and applicable
interest rate, Huang owed Plaintiffs $210,387.60. Motion for Default Judgment ¶ 19,
ECF No. 20, Page ID 88. As of the date of the filing of this Order, Huang has not
responded to this action in any way.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Under Rule 55, “[w]hen a party ‘has failed to plead or otherwise defend’ against a
pleading listed in Rule 7(a), entry of default under Rule 55(a) must precede grant of a
default judgment under Rule 55(b). Johnson v. Dayton Elec. Mfg. Co., 140 F.3d 781,
783 (8th Cir. 1998) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 55) (citing 10 Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R.
Miller, and Mary Kay Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2682 (2d ed. 1983)).
“Entry of a default under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) is not, as such, entry of a
judgment; it merely permits the plaintiff to move for a default judgment under Rule
Huang made her second payment of the modified schedule on April 30, 2016, five months after
it was due, in the amount of $53,857.75. Zhao Affidavit ¶ 14, ECF No. 21, Page ID 91. Huang made her
third payment on July 20, 2016, nearly five months after it was due, in the amount of $74,531.20. Id. ¶
17. Neither payment accounted for the interest accrued on the delinquent amounts, which totaled
$22,495.58. Id. ¶¶ 15 & 18.
55(b)(2), assuming that the default is not set aside under Rule 55(c).”
American Home Furniture Placement, Inc., 120 F.3d 117, 118 n.2 (8th Cir. 1997).
Moreover, “a default judgment cannot be entered until the amount of damages has been
ascertained.” Hagen v. Sisseton–Wahpeton Community College, 205 F.3d 1040, 1042
(8th Cir. 2000) (quoting Enron Oil Corp. v. Diakuhara, 10 F.3d 90, 97 (2d Cir. 1993)).
In summary, a default judgment under Rule 55 is a two-step process. First, “the
party seeking a default judgment must have the clerk enter the default by submitting the
required proof that the opposing party has failed to plead or otherwise defend . . . .”
Fraserside IP L.L.C. v. Youngtek Sols. Ltd., 796 F. Supp. 2d 946, 951 (N.D. Iowa 2011)
(quoting Hayek v. Big Bros./Big Sisters of Am., 198 F.R.D. 518, 520 (N.D. Iowa 2001)).
Second, after the clerk has entered a default, “the moving party may seek entry of
judgment on the default under either subdivision (b)(1) or (b)(2) of the rule.” Id. (quoting
Hayek, 198 F.R.D. at 520).
The Court cannot rule on Motion for Default Judgment because the Clerk of
Court has not entered a default against Huang. Therefore, the Court will construe the
Plaintiffs’ Motion as a motion for clerk’s entry of default. The Court will refer the Motion
for Default Judgment to the Clerk of Court. In the event that the Clerk of Court enters a
default, the Court will then consider the Motion for Default Judgment after Huang has
had an opportunity to respond. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
The Motion for Default Judgment, ECF No. 20, is construed as a motion
for clerk’s entry of default under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) and is referred to the
Clerk of Court;
In the event the Clerk of Court enters a default against Defendant Ji Feng
The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum
and Order as well as the entry of default to the address listed
Ji Feng Huang
38-1 Nanfugong, Yunfeng RD
Baiyun District, Guiyang City
Guizhou, China 550014
Defendant Ji Feng Huang must respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion for
Default Judgment, ECF No. 20, within fourteen days after the Clerk
of Court’s entry of default; and
The Clerk of Court is directed not to terminate the Motion that
appears at ECF No. 20, but to set a response deadline of fourteen
days from the date of the entry of default.
Dated this 26th day of January, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
s/Laurie Smith Camp
Chief United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?