United States of America v. Seeley et al

Filing 31

ORDER approving and adopting the 30 Stipulation. Paragraphs 111 and 113 are struck from Kenneth Seeley's Answer (Filing No. 15 ). Paragraphs 109, 112, and 114 are struck from Eileen Seeley's Answer (Filing No. 14 ). All terms and conditions are in effect as if fully set forth herein. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MKR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) KENNETH SEELEY, ) EILEEN SEELEY, ) JAMES FONTANO as trustee of KEA TRUST, ) and HOLT COUNTY, NEBRASKA, ) ) Defendants. ) Case No. 8:15CV316-LES-TDT ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES, KENNETH SEELEY, AND EILEEN SEELEY This matter is before the Court on the Stipulation Between the United States, Kenneth Seeley, and Eileen Seeley (Filing No. 30). The Court finds the Stipulation should be approved and adopted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) The Stipulation is approved and adopted. 2) Paragraphs 111 and 113 are struck from Kenneth Seeley’s Answer (Filing No. 15). 3) Paragraphs 109, 112, and 114 are struck from Eileen Seeley’s Answer (Filing No. 14). 4) All terms and conditions are in effect as if fully set forth herein. DATED this 4th day of January, 2016. . BY THE COURT: /s/ Lyle E. Strom _____________________________ LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge United States District Court 1 Submitted and approved by: /s/Harris J. Phillips HARRIS J. PHILLIPS Massachusetts Bar #: 675603 Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 7238, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 Telephone: (202) 616-1906 Fax: (202) 514-6770 Harris.J.Phillips@usdoj.gov Attorney for the United States /s/Bonnie M. Boryca (electronic signature affixed with consent) BONNIE M. BORYCA, #24886 Erickson Sederstrom, P.C. 10330 Regency Parkway Drive Omaha, NE 68114 (402) 397-2200 boryca@eslaw.com Attorney for Defendants Kenneth Seeley and Eileen Seeley 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?