Guerry v. Frakes et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Filing No. 20 ) is denied without prejudice to reassertion. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Filing No. 26 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
BRIAN FRANK GUERRY,
SCOTT FRAKES, Director, BRIAN
GAGE, Warden, GUIFFE, Case
Worker, THOMPSON, Case Worker,
and NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF
Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the appointment of counsel in this matter.
(Filing No. 20.) The court cannot routinely appoint counsel in civil cases. In Davis
v. Scott, 94 F.3d 444, 447 (8th Cir. 1996), the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals
explained that “[i]ndigent civil litigants do not have a constitutional or statutory right
to appointed counsel.” Trial courts have “broad discretion to decide whether both the
plaintiff and the court will benefit from the appointment of counsel, taking into
account the factual and legal complexity of the case, the presence or absence of
conflicting testimony, and the plaintiff’s ability to investigate the facts and present his
claim.” Id. Having considered these factors, the request for the appointment of
counsel will be denied without prejudice to reassertion at a later time.
On May 20, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Default Judgment (Filing No. 26),
asserting that Defendants had failed to answer or otherwise defend in this matter. This
motion will be denied as Defendants filed a timely motion to dismiss. (Filing No. 24.)
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Counsel (Filing No. 20) is denied without
prejudice to reassertion.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Filing No. 26) is denied.
DATED this 27th day of June, 2016.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?