Wynne v. Douglas County Department of Corrections, et al
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that: This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute it diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. The court will enter judgment by a separate document. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 6) is denied as moot. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (ADB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
STEPHEN M. WYNNE,
Plaintiff,
v.
DOUGLAS COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
8:15CV330
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER
On September 29, 2015, the court ordered Plaintiff to update his address with
the court within 30 days or face dismissal of this action. To date, Plaintiff has not
updated his address or taken any other action in this matter.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: This matter is dismissed without
prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute it diligently and failed to comply with
this court’s orders. The court will enter judgment by a separate document. Plaintiff’s
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 6) is denied as moot.
DATED this 3rd day of November, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
Senior United States District Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District
of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they
provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The
court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases
to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?